
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Mirror problem
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2006 May 5, 14:27 -0400
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2006 May 5, 14:27 -0400
Dear Frank, In your message Thu May 04 2006 - 21:57:26 EDT you wrote: >Since your instrument passed certification by not one, but two, >recognized experts I doubt your mirrors are the problem. I have some doubts on "certification by recognized experts", as expressed in my recent message on Sextant certificates Thu May 04 2006 - 13:05:50 EDT, Using this opportunity, I correct the addresses of the two pictures mentioned in that message, they are http://www.math.purdue.edu/~eremenko/cert1.jpeg and http://www.math.purdue.edu/~eremenko/cert2.jpeg The reasons of my doubts are: 1) C+P certificate says "free from errors for practical use" and Freiberger's certificate shows 13" arc error at one place. I agree that 13" is OK for "practical use" but not for the Lunar and star distances that I am doing. And I guarantee that nothing has happened to the sextant between these two certifications. 2) My multiple attempts to check the arc myself using star distances give quite consistent results that DISAGREE with BOTH certificates by 0'.7 to 0'.8. This is of course essential, even for "practical use". But certainly I cannot be 100% sure in these results because I might just be a poor observer, or some other effect than the deformation of the arc could explain this. Alex.