NavList:

   

Reply

Maybe amen. But not before it is said that the discussion was a bit inaccurate 
up to now. Allow me only two short statements:

If Churchill had taken Hitler's and Darlan's obligations (never to use the 
French fleet against GB) seriously in the situation of the year 1940, he 
would have been a shithead and malefactor simultaneously. What would have 
been worse?

But Darlan and the French Navy fulfilled this obligation to the last iota, 
even after Mers el Kebir. Toulon 1942 proves it.


Jan Kalivoda


----- Original Message -----
From: "Henry C. Halboth" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: Mers el Kebir


> Amen
>
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 00:17:05 -0500 Alexandre Eremenko
>  writes:
> > I repeat my proposal to stick to navigation
> > topics. I think this war is too recent, and
> > discussion of these topics could lead us very far
> > from the main subject of this mailing list.
> >
> > On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, Craig wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry George, I don't see any treachery from the British side, and
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 7.0.271 / Virus Database: 264.9.3 - Release Date: 17.9.2004
>
>

   

Reply