Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Meridional parts
    From: Pete Harmsworth
    Date: 1996 May 02, 12:18 -0600

    I am attempting to set up an Excel spreadsheet in order to input Origin
    & Destination lat & long and output and output rhumb line course and
    distance. This involes calculating meridional parts. Page 552 of
    Bowditch (1995) gives the formula as M=7915.704468 log tan b (45+L/2)-
    23.0133633 sinL-0.051353 sin^3L-0.000206 sin^5L...
    L is the latitude but I can find no mention of b in the text. Does
    anyone know if this is a typo (I wouldn't want to white it out in my
    book if it wasn't). Has anyone coded it into a spreadsheet. I left the b
    out but the result wasn't even close to the value in Table 6. Thanks for
    any input on this.
    
    Pete Harmsworth
    pharms@awinc.com
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This mail list is managed by the majordomo program.
    To  from this list, send the following message
    to majordomo@ronin.com:    navigation
    For help, send the following message to majordomo@ronin.com: help
    Do NOT send administrative requests to navigation@ronin.com. Thanks. -ben
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    From mail Tue May  7 17:48 EDT 1996
    Received: from dg-rtp by wellspring.us.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-gens08)
    	id AA05975; Tue, 7 May 1996 17:48:26 -0400
    Received: from gomoku.ronin.com by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02)
    	id AA18459; Tue, 7 May 1996 17:48:21 -0400
    Received: (from majordom@localhost) by ronin.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id RAA10004 for 
    navigation-outgoing; Tue, 7 May 1996 17:29:51 -0400
    Received: from mailout00.btx.dtag.de (mailout00.btx.dtag.de [194.25.2.148]) by 
    ronin.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA09990 for ; 
    Tue, 7 May 1996 17:29:23 -0400
    Received: from mailto00.btx.dtag.de ([172.16.2.1]) by mailout00.btx.dtag.de with
    	 smtp (S3.1.29.1) id ; Tue, 7 May 96 22:32 MET DST
    Received: from funnel04.btx.dtag.de (0234263524-0001(btxid)@[194.25.2.5])
    	by mailto00.btx.dtag.de with  smtp (S3.1.29.1)
    	id ; Tue, 7 May 96 22:32 MET DST
    To: navigation@ronin.com
    Subject: RE meridional parts formula
    Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 20:32:01 GMT
    Message-Id: <318fb337.7477050@mailto.btx.dtag.de>
    X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99d/16.182
    X-Sender: 0234263524-0001@t-online.de (Hans Thomas Feuerhelm)
    From: HT.Feuerhelm@t-online.de (Hans Thomas Feuerhelm)
    Sender: owner-navigation@ronin.com
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: HT.Feuerhelm@t-online.de (Hans Thomas Feuerhelm)
    Errors-To: owner-majordomo@ronin.com
    Content-Type: text
    Content-Length: 2089
    
    Hi,
    
    Following the discussion about meridional parts, I have some
    remarks and questions :
    
    1. The formula comes from integration of  dS = (Earth radius)
        / cos(latitude) between the limits equator and current
        latitude.
    
    2. After Integration, the formula is then
        S = R(Earth) * ln ( tan ( 45d + lat/2) ),
       assuming the Earth to be a SPHERE.
    
    3. What Radius to use :
        We learned : make it 360d * 60' / (2 * pi)  nautical
        miles, giving  R(Earth) = 3437.74677....
    
    4. when using log instead of ln, one has to multiply with
        log (e), yielding the "magic number"  7915.71315....
        When oher numbers do appear,  I think the author uses
       some other definition of Earth radius...
    
    5. Compensating for the ellispoidal form of the earth could
        be done in two ways (hi ho, guessing...)
       a) incorporate a latitude-dependant factor into the number
           for the earth radius  or
       b) subtracting some latitude-dependant number, which will
           have to increase when going to the poles. This seems
           to be  what  the sine - power-series of subtractions is
          about.
    
    However, I do feel uncomfortable when having to apply
    corrections to formulae without knowing the assumptions
    behind. These corrections seem to have something to do with
    the different "Chart Datums", another big secret to all
    navigational textbooks i've seen so far. Does anyone have a
    hint, idea or link about how to find more about this ?
    Many Thanks in advance !!
    
    Until then, I will continue assuming the earth to be a sphere,
    use "ln" and 3437,74677 and forget about all these sinuses ..
    :-))
    
    Best regards,
    and - Don't sink the ship...
    Tom
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This mail list is managed by the majordomo program.
    To  from this list, send the following message
    to majordomo@ronin.com:    navigation
    For help, send the following message to majordomo@ronin.com: help
    Do NOT send administrative requests to navigation@ronin.com. Thanks. -ben
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    From mail Fri May 10 18:16 EDT 1996
    Received: from dg-rtp by wellspring.us.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-gens08)
    	id AA29827; Fri, 10 May 1996 18:16:42 -0400
    Received: from gomoku.ronin.com by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02)
    	id AA11707; Fri, 10 May 1996 18:16:36 -0400
    Received: (from majordom@localhost) by ronin.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id SAA07316 for 
    navigation-outgoing; Fri, 10 May 1996 18:03:45 -0400
    Received: from mail.euronet.nl (mail.euronet.nl [194.134.0.67]) by ronin.com 
    (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA07311 for ; Fri, 10 May 
    1996 18:03:41 -0400
    Received: from p503.asd.euronet.nl (p503.asd.euronet.nl [194.134.1.164]) by 
    mail.euronet.nl (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA01042 for 
    ; Sat, 11 May 1996 00:10:20 +0200 (MET DST)
    Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 00:10:20 +0200 (MET DST)
    Message-Id: <199605102210.AAA01042@mail.euronet.nl>
    X-Sender: puffelej@mail.euronet.nl
    X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
    Mime-Version: 1.0
    To: navigation@ronin.com
    From: puffelej@euronet.nl (Jan van Puffelen)
    Subject: Re: RE meridional parts formula
    Sender: owner-navigation@ronin.com
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: puffelej@euronet.nl (Jan van Puffelen)
    Errors-To: owner-majordomo@ronin.com
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    Content-Length: 1691
    Status: RO
    
    Hans Thomas Feuerhelm wrote:
    
    >Hi,
    >
    >Following the discussion about meridional parts, I have some
    >remarks and questions :
    >
    >1. The formula comes from integration of  dS = (Earth radius)
    >    / cos(latitude) between the limits equator and current
    >    latitude.
    >
    >2. After Integration, the formula is then
    >    S = R(Earth) * ln ( tan ( 45d + lat/2) ),
    >   assuming the Earth to be a SPHERE.
    >
    Rather than using the formula LN(TAN(45+lat/2)) the formula LN(TAN lat
    +1/COS lat) may be used as well. This saved a few memory positions in my
    CASIO FX 702P (BASIC) programmable calculator.
    
    I have never known that this method was called the Meridional Parts method.
    Can someone explain the origin of that name? It is called "Vergrotende
    Breedte" (lit. magnifying latitude) in Dutch while while the simple method
    is called Middenbreedte or Middel Breedte method (lit. mid or average latitude).
    
    There is a formula which compensates for the ellipsoidal form of the earth.
    It has a few more terms. I must have it somewhere (probably in the attic). I
    have tested that formula a long time ago and concluded that for all
    practical puposes the simpler formula for the perfect sphere is just as good.
    
    Regards,
    puffelej@euronet.nl (Jan van Puffelen)
    
    
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This mail list is managed by the majordomo program.
    To  from this list, send the following message
    to majordomo@ronin.com:    navigation
    For help, send the following message to majordomo@ronin.com: help
    Do NOT send administrative requests to navigation@ronin.com. Thanks. -ben
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    From mail Sat May 11 11:50 EDT 1996
    Received: from dg-rtp by wellspring.us.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-gens08)
    	id AA26228; Sat, 11 May 1996 11:50:12 -0400
    Received: from gomoku.ronin.com by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02)
    	id AA18401; Sat, 11 May 1996 11:50:07 -0400
    Received: (from majordom@localhost) by ronin.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id LAA26141 for 
    navigation-outgoing; Sat, 11 May 1996 11:37:01 -0400
    Received: from mailout01.btx.dtag.de (mailout01.btx.dtag.de [194.25.2.149]) by 
    ronin.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA26105 for ; 
    Sat, 11 May 1996 11:34:51 -0400
    Received: from mailto00.btx.dtag.de ([172.16.2.1]) by mailout01.btx.dtag.de with
    	 smtp (S3.1.29.1) id ; Sat, 11 May 96 17:37 MET DST
    Received: from funnel19.btx.dtag.de (0234263524-0001(btxid)@[194.25.2.20])
    	by mailto00.btx.dtag.de with  smtp (S3.1.29.1)
    	id ; Sat, 11 May 96 17:36 MET DST
    To: navigation@ronin.com
    Subject: RE: meridional parts again + Datum
    Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 15:37:10 GMT
    Message-Id: <3194b420.62945203@mailto.btx.dtag.de>
    X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99d/16.182
    X-Sender: 0234263524-0001@t-online.de (Hans Thomas Feuerhelm)
    From: HT.Feuerhelm@t-online.de (Hans Thomas Feuerhelm)
    Sender: owner-navigation@ronin.com
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: HT.Feuerhelm@t-online.de (Hans Thomas Feuerhelm)
    Errors-To: owner-majordomo@ronin.com
    Content-Type: text
    Content-Length: 3888
    Status: RO
    
    Hi Crew,
    
    Meridional parts (MP) are still bothering us over here...
    This is what I've collected so far :
    
    1) Here in Old Germany, all the books say that MP's are ok
       for practical navigation assumming the Earth being a
       sphere (e.g. M?ller Krauss, the "bible" for merchant navy
       education, and also Fulst, Nautical Tables). M?ller Krauss
       mentions that correcting for the ellipsoid is done in chart
       making, but doesnt bother to tell the dumb guys how this is
       done...
    
      So, to stay friends with my european sailing buddies, I'd
      have to stick to the following :
      - Earth is a shpere
      -1 nm = 1852,000. m,
      - the equator has 360 * 60  = 21600 nm
      - Earth radius from this is 21600 / (2pi) = 3437,74677078 nm
     giving the equivalent formulae :
    
     (USING NATURAL LOGARITHMS)
    
      MP(LAT) = 3437,74677 * ln ( tan ( 45 + LAT/2) )
     or, many thanks to Jan van Puffelen  (!!):
      MP(LAT) = 3437,74677 * ln ( tan (LAT) -1/cos(LAT) )
    
    ( USING LOG to Base 10 )
    
     MP(LAT) =  7915,70447 * LOG ( tan ( 45 + LAT/2) )
     MP(LAT) =  7915,70447 * LOG ( tan(LAT) - 1/cos(LAT) )
    
     I checked Jan's Formula (using the cos..) and it gave exactly
    the same results, except for LATs above 85d, but who'd want to
    go there, anyway. It looks like tan (45 + x/2)  is the same as
     tan(x) -1/cos(x). Seems worthwhile to refresh all that trig
    stuff from high school....
    
    2.) Assuming Earth an ellispoid, as many Silicon sea
    navigators do (and honestly, nothing wrong with that!!)  gives
    need for correction with the sine power series from the
    postings. Checking this, it looks sufficient to me to just use
    the first term, as DAN already said.
    
    Redoing the last DR from Silicon Sea leg 12, I have :
    
    111,3 d / 1167,8 nm  ( MP "elliptical")
    111,4 d / 1164,5 nm  ( MP "sphere" )
    111,4 d / 1163,3 nm  ("mid Latitude")
    
    At first sight, MP "sphere" is closer to "mid Latitude", which
    until now, I've always used as a parallel check. Second
    thought : "mid-Latitude" also assumes a sphere and not an
    ellipsoid (sigh !) This is a hard life for beginning
    navigators !!!
    
    So what do I do, stick with my old german buddies, ignore the
    ellipoid and make a bad impression on the "elliptical" people,
    
    or become "ellipsoidal", resulting to fail german exams on
    navigation ?
    
    BTW : the "sphere" .model is 3,3 nm "faster", an equivalent of
    25 minutes at 7,8 knots, but what's 25 minutes on a leg of 6,5
    days with all possible surprises to come.....
    
    3. Referencing the ellipsoid
    Reading about the different ellipsoids (there's 20 I've
    collected so far), the books say that apart from using the
    equator and polar radius, one has to define a well established
    reference ("DATUM"), so that the ellipsoidal grid of LATs +
    LONs is adjusted to a certain wellknown point. The ones I've
    found :
    
    Potsdamer Datum :
      uses Bessel ellipsoid and references to
      "Helmert Turm"  52d 22'' 53,954'' N,  013d 04' 01,153'' E
    
    European Datum :
      uses "international Hayford" and references to
      "Helmert Turm"  52d 22' 51,45'' N,  013d 03'  58,74'' E
      (now used for German Maps of Europe)
    
    What "Datums" are used in the US ?
    
    This would mean, that you'd have different LATs and LONs even
    when reading exactly the same object from different chart
    designs. Well, I do hate to think about these consequences.
    What about all these waypoint tabulations ?  GPS ?  (ha,ha),
    the integrated navigation programs ?
    
    Almost being as lost as Odysseus,  I'll go for some sherry..
    
    bye for now,
    TOM
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This mail list is managed by the majordomo program.
    To  from this list, send the following message
    to majordomo@ronin.com:    navigation
    For help, send the following message to majordomo@ronin.com: help
    Do NOT send administrative requests to navigation@ronin.com. Thanks. -ben
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site