NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Meridional Distances
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2002 Sep 19, 16:21 -0700
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2002 Sep 19, 16:21 -0700
Vic Fraenckel wrote: > > My routines give the azimuth (referenced to true north) of the second point > from the first point (and the azimuth from the second point to the first > point - NOT recipricals on an ellipse). Yes, that's what I figured you meant. I don't even know what a reciprocal on an ellipse is. My point was that the Mercator methods yield a rhumb line, which is easier to follow. You simply keep a constant heading throughout the voyage. (I'm ignoring variation etc. for simplicity.) On the other hand, computing the azimuth from Point A to Point B yields the initial heading for a great circle course. However, if the vessel stays on that heading it will miss Point B. The miss may be trivial or huge, depending on distance and the lat/lon of the points. The rhumb line and great circle methods both have their place in the navigator's arsenal.