Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Mendoza's lunars, and Merrifield's.
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2004 Aug 7, 22:44 +0100

    With Frank Reed's help, from his "Easy Lunars" and later postings, I'm
    starting to understand more about the "approximate" methods for clearing
    lunars.
    
    Armed with the recipe, in Norie's, for using Mendoza's method, I have been
    using some "reverse engineering" to discover the basic trig. that underlies
    it.
    
    Cotter's "History of Nautical Astronomy doesn't tackle Mendoza's method,
    but does analyse Merrifield's method of many years later. This is an
    approximate method appearing to have many similarities to Mendoza.
    
    Cotter tells us that in 1884, Merrifield "described a method for clearing
    lunar distances which he had invented...   ...The method is direct in its
    application, requires no special tables, and is claimed to be a very close
    approximation, well adapted for sea use...."
    
    However, those claims seem to be somewhat overstated, if Cotter's account
    of his method is to be accepted at face value. We have to be a bit careful
    here, because Cotter has proved to be very error-prone in other contexts,
    in his book.
    
    As far as my understanding goes, Merrifield's clearing method is only
    trivially different from Mendoza's, with one important exception which we
    will address in the next paragraph. Mendoza corrects his observed lunar
    distance by adding two terms, which Frank has notated as dh_Moon*A and
    dh_Sun*B, which make the assumption that the little right-angled triangles
    that are used to add and subtract corrections are, as near as dammit, plane
    triangles. That is what Merrifield does, too, to give exactly the same
    result.
    
    But then Mendoza goes a step further, adding an additional small
    correction: a quadratic term that Frank refers to as "Q", with numbers
    taken from Table XXXV in Norie's. And that step is omitted completely by
    Merrifield. That omission appears to be the basis of Merrifield's
    "invention"! That's why his method "requires no special tables", because he
    simply neglects that part of the correction that would call for them. In
    doing so, he ignores a correction term that could amount to half an
    arc-minute or more under some circumstances; a serious matter for a lunar.
    
    So, it seems to me, in the 70 years or so between Mendoza's publication and
    Merrifield's, lunar-distance navigation had taken a serious step backwards.
    Such is progress!
    
    George.
    
    ================================================================
    contact George Huxtable by email at george---.u-net.com, by phone at
    01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
    Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ================================================================
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site