Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Measuring (and calculating) Dip
    From: Marcel Tschudin
    Date: 2013 Feb 27, 23:39 +0200
    Brad, regarding your following explanation for the origin of the value 0.02977 for calculating the dip


    I have seen

    dip = arccos ( (R/(1-k)) / ( h + R/(1-k)) ) 
    where R is the radius of the earth
               k is the refraction factor (?)
               h is the height of eye
    But in this equation, we are left to guess at k, nominally assigned a value of 0.13.  In doing so, the equation agrees within seconds to the 0.02977 result.

    I forgot before to put the corresponding k=0.13 value in relation to some other commonly used dip values:

    Bowditch (and I think the same is also in the N.A.) provides the formula Dip=1.76 moa * SQRT(H in m); this corresponds to k=1.6.

    Calculating refraction by ray tracing with the standard atmosphere and standard condition (10C, 1010hPa) one obtains a dip which corresponds to k=0.17

    Replacing in the standard atmosphere the lapse rate in the troposphere with the dry adiabatic (10K/km) or the wet adiabatic (5K/km) ones result correspondingly in k=0.15 (dry) and k=0.18 (wet).

    I also did come across a Web-page (in German) which mentions k=0.13 (or rather 1/8) but adds also that during the night with covered sky k may be 0.2 and during nights with clear sky may reach up to 0.3.

    I am still in the process of analysing my measurements of refraction plus dip during sunsets (sun below about 4 deg above horizon) and am still trying to find useful correlations which will improve the results. I am therefore not yet in a position to propose a best estimate for the dip. Present (preliminary) results indicate that with the parameters which were derived from the standard atmosphere the calculated refraction plus dip agrees reasonably with the mean values (actually rather the medians or even better the modes) of the heavily scattering  measurements.

    Marcel

    P.S: I will answer separately your last contribution which only just arrived.
       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site