NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Martelli's Navigational Tables
From: Henry Halboth
Date: 2005 May 29, 17:30 -0400
From: Henry Halboth
Date: 2005 May 29, 17:30 -0400
Victor My tables, i.e., 1914 edition, encompass only 52 pages, and contain no frills, although it is possible to adapt them to an intercept method and to make other calculations by the substitution of values. I have always considered Martelli's formulation to be innovative and interesting, although for many years my short tabular method of preference was Dreisenstok, which superceded my use of Martelli. Thanks for an interesting side track to methods of yesteryear Henry On Sat, 28 May 2005 11:36:52 -0600 Victor Garandwrites: > Henry, > The 1952 edition (new GHA edition with additional examples and quick > reference charts (59 pages) ...) includes the following: > -Position Line (sun or star), longitude, latitude and intercept (St. > Hilaire > or calculated altitude) methods. > -Position Line (circumpolar star), longitude, latitude and intercept > (St. > Hilaire or calculated altitude) methods. > -Deviation of magnetic compass. > -High-altitude ex-meridian. > -Amplitudes. > -Identification of stars. > -Great Circle distance and initial course. > -Calculation of points on Great Circle. > > Googling, I found that some used book dealers have a copy of these > tables > but I couldn't ascertain the vintage. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Henry C. Halboth" > To: > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 9:22 PM > Subject: Re: Martelli's Navigational Tables > > > >I have used the 1914 edition and still do for the time sight > solution. I > > really did not know that these tables had continued in print as > late as > > 1952 and must assume them to have been modernized to allow for an > > intercept and azimuth solution. > > > > On Wed, 25 May 2005 10:17:27 -0600 Victor Garand > > writes: > >> Is there anyone on the list who still uses these? My edition is a > >> 1952 edition, is there a later edition? > > >