Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Marq St. Hilaire - Altitude intercept method
    From: Gary LaPook
    Date: 2007 Oct 26, 00:48 -0700
    Gary LaPook writes:

    My question for you is "how many angels  to you want to get dancing on the head of your pin?"

    You are right, one line is a chord and one is a tangent but to the available level of accuracy of measuring the altitude and of plotting it on a chart they are the same for all practical purposes. For example, if you plotted two positions determined by the Sumner method 30 NM apart and drew the line between them making one LOP. Then you calculate the same LOP using St. Hilaire for a spot in the center of the two Sumner positions you are right, you would end up with two different LOPs that parallel each other. However, for any altitude up to 77º they would be less than .1 NM apart, that's right, one tenth of one nautical mile! How thick is the line your pencil makes on the chart? How accurate are all of your sextant sights? Do you always achieve one tenth of a minute accuracy? People on this list talk about getting .5 minute of accuracy as a very good result on a boat and with that level of accuracy the difference between a Sumner line and a St. Hilaire line only becomes an issue for sights above 86º. How many times have you taken sights above 86º? Navigation is the art and science of directing a vessel or aircraft safely from one place to another, it is not a mathematical exercise that you do at home on a computer to an accuracy of 42 significant figures. And I don't use "the analytic equation of each LoP on a Mercator chart" I draw a pencil line that has thickness and some level of inaccuracy in azimuth. Everything plotted on a chart is an approximation to some extent and for navigation purposes (not theoretical discussion purposes) the Sumner and St. Hilaire methods produce the same LOP.

    gl


    Andres Ruiz wrote:
    In messages: [NavList 3572], [NavList 3588], [NavList 3596] There is an error of concept.
    
    Gary is not absolutely correct.
      
    St. Hilaire's method created the exact same LOP as Sumner's method but
    only required doing the computation one time, saving work and reducing
    the chance for an error.
        
    
    The Sumner and the St-Hilaire LoPs are not the same. One is secant to the circle of equal altitude and other is tangent. This means that the points in common between the CoP and the each LoP are different. If You get the analytic equation of each LoP on a Mercator chart You can see that the two lines are not the same.
    
    For more details see the attached PDF.
    
    Please, I want to hear more opinions.
    
    Andrés Ruiz
    Navigational Algorithms
    http://www.geocities.com/andresruizgonzalez
    
    
      


    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site