Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Marq St. Hilaire - Altitude intercept method
    From: Andr�s Ruiz
    Date: 2007 Oct 26, 10:46 +0200

    Gary, my question for you is: are you saying I and writing silly things????
    No mere controversy please. You can retract your question!
    Language is for providing communication to people. Not is the same:
    "St. Hilaire's method created the exact same LOP as Sumner's method" or
    "Sumner and St. Hilaire methods produce the same LOP" or -In the practice of 
    old celestial navigation the result of using Sumner or St-Hilaire LoPs is the 
    near the same assumed usual circumstances.-
    2+2= 4
    1.99+2.001 approx 4
    Anybody with good background knowledge in navigation can filter the 
    information and read between the lines, but write without rigor can confuse 
    to the beginners in CN.
    Of course navigation is an art, but also a science and the advances in 
    sciences arise by understanding previous knowledge and acquiring new one. 
    Are you agree?
    To test the discrepancy between the to lines, imagine you are in the middle of 
    the North Atlantic Ocean and a two days storm apart from your course several 
    miles away. Now your DR position is far away from the true one. The 
    differences of the results using the two methods depends on the assumed 
    position, and increase, as the distance between the true and assumed position 
    De: NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] En nombre de Gary J. LaPook
    Enviado el: viernes, 26 de octubre de 2007 9:48
    Para: NavList@fer3.com
    Asunto: [NavList 3620] Re: Marq St. Hilaire - Altitude intercept method
    Gary LaPook writes:
    My question for you is "how many angels� to you want to get dancing on the head of your pin?"
    You are right, one line is a chord and one is a tangent but to the available 
    level of accuracy of measuring the altitude and of plotting it on a chart 
    they are the same for all practical purposes. For example, if you plotted two 
    positions determined by the Sumner method 30 NM apart and drew the line 
    between them making one LOP. Then you calculate the same LOP using St. 
    Hilaire for a spot in the center of the two Sumner positions you are right, 
    you would end up with two different LOPs that parallel each other. However, 
    for any altitude up to 77� they would be less than .1 NM apart, that's right, 
    one tenth of one nautical mile! How thick is the line your pencil makes on 
    the chart? How accurate are all of your sextant sights? Do you always achieve 
    one tenth of a minute accuracy? People on this list talk about getting .5 
    minute of accuracy as a very good result on a boat and with that level of 
    accuracy the difference between a Sumner line and a St. Hilaire line only 
    becomes an issue for sights above 86�. How many times have you taken sights 
    above 86�? Navigation is the art and science of directing a vessel or 
    aircraft safely from one place to another, it is not a mathematical exercise 
    that you do at home on a computer to an accuracy of 42 significant figures. 
    And I don't use "the analytic equation of each LoP on a Mercator chart" I 
    draw a pencil line that has thickness and some level of inaccuracy in 
    azimuth. Everything plotted on a chart is an approximation to some extent and 
    for navigation purposes (not theoretical discussion purposes) the Sumner and 
    St. Hilaire methods produce the same LOP.
    Andres Ruiz wrote: 
    In messages: [NavList 3572], [NavList 3588], [NavList 3596] There is an error of concept.
    Gary is not absolutely correct.
    St. Hilaire's method created the exact same LOP as Sumner's method but 
    only required doing the computation one time, saving work and reducing 
    the chance for an error.
    The Sumner and the St-Hilaire LoPs are not the same. One is secant to the 
    circle of equal altitude and other is tangent. This means that the points in 
    common between the CoP and the each LoP are different. If You get the 
    analytic equation of each LoP on a Mercator chart You can see that the two 
    lines are not the same.
    For more details see the attached PDF.
    Please, I want to hear more opinions.
    Andr�s Ruiz
    Navigational Algorithms
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site