Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Mark III plastic sextant
    From: Peter Monta
    Date: 2020 Jun 6, 17:44 -0700
    You may also find the books "How to Use Plastic Sextants" and "GPS Backup with a Mark 3 Sextant", by David Burch, of interest.

    The horizon mirror has no adjustments, correct, but this is less critical to performance than one might suspect at first.  Essentially one can choose between side error and perpendicularity error using the single index-mirror screw (leaving aside the nearly-independent index-error adjustment, which rounds out the available suite of two adjustments).  On mine I adjust for perpendicularity (of the index mirror to the plane of the arc), and let side error fall where it may.  The error for sight angles more than a few degrees is negligibly small.

    For sextant adjustment theory, I'm not sure there's anything better than the old books by Chauvenet, "A Manual of Spherical and Practical Astronomy" (in two volumes; the second volume has the particulars on sextants), and Simms, "The Sextant and its Applications".  Google has full PDFs for download.

    An artificial horizon is very useful for practice on land.  The eyepiece shades on the Mark 3 are not strong enough to attenuate the Sun's light to safe levels, even with a liquid flat (let alone a mirror), so you'd need to supplement with a stronger shade such as a piece of eclipse-glasses film.  Or pick a landmark near the horizon that's reasonably near the Sun's azimuth and pretend it's the true horizon; that's fine for practice too.

    You can test the sextant, and maybe make a small table of corrections for arc error, using terrestrial angles, if those are measured with a theodolite first.  Alternatively, star-to-star angles can be used.

    Despite its limitations, the Mark 3 is fine for honest navigation---positioning to within a few nautical miles is within its performance envelope with careful use.  The only thing it really struggles with is lunar distances, which need higher accuracy.


    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site