Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Making an artificial horizon, and leveling thereof
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2011 Jan 26, 18:47 -0000

    It seems to me that there's more to Alan's index-error problems than just
    his use of a too-close roofline.
    
    He has confirmed that there's been no fiddling with the mirror-screws
    during this history of on-land observations, and that results are always
    much more consistent when he checks index error using a real sea horizon.
    One question that might provide some clue is this; when he observes a true
    sea-horizon, what index error does he usually arrive at?
    
    Both Geoffrey and Gary have pointed to the use of a too-close object for
    aligning on. And indeed, if that object is as close as a quarter-mile
    (Alan's estimate), then it would cause an error of around half an
    arc-minute in the result. But that should be a consistent error, compared
    with his sea-horizon value; always about half a minute off-the-arc, if Alan
    always uses the same roofline, or another roof about the same distance off.
    But whatever the distance, it should always be in the same direction,
    off-the-arc, compared with a truly distant horizon.
    
    But the errors Alan reports are very different from that picture. The
    variation is much greater, and sometimes on-the-arc, sometimes off it.
    What's going on?
    
    Is Alan perhaps mistakenly attributing some of his off-the-arc observations
    as on-the-arc, or vice versa? I ask him to explain exactly how he
    distinguishes between them. It should depend only on the reading of the
    micrometer drum. If the reading is just above zero, in the region of the
    drum between the zero mark and, say, 10', then it's on-the-arc. If it's
    less than zero, so in the region between 50' and zero, then it's
    off-the-arc.
    
    What makes me a bit suspicious is Alan's explanation of his procedure,
    where he says-
    
    "Zero the micrometer, I'm using an Astra 111B sextant. Then zero the index
    arm.
    Re the AH shots listed, I focoused the sextant scope on the roof lines of
    small buildings, private residences, within 1/4 mile of where I stood,
    beyond that proceeding as sextant instructions I've seen say, adjusting the
    micrometer till I got an "unbroken horizon line", that being the
    aforementioned roof line. Read the error off the micrometer, subtracting
    for "on the arc", adding for "off the arc"."
    
    Just for the FOCUSSING operation on the telescope, using rooflines a
    quartter-mile away is perfectly adequate; it's insensitive to the exact
    distance. But then for the ALIGNMENT of the two images, that calls for
    sighting on something more than a mile away, as has been explained.
    
    But I don't follow Alan's two-step process, as explained- "Zero the
    micrometer ... then zero the index arm". As long as the pointer on the
    index arm reads close to zero on its coarse, whole-degrees, scale, that's
    good enough, and no further attention needs to be given to it. Then align
    the two images to form an unbroken line, and read the micrometer minutes
    off the drum, in divisions (and decimals) away from zero, on or off the arc
    as stated above. That's it; job done; no call to "zero the index arm",
    whatever that means.
    
    Perhaps I'm misunderstanding Alan's procedure. I am clutching at straws,
    somewhat, in trying to understand what is going so wrong.
    
    George.
    
    contact George Huxtable, at  george{at}hux.me.uk
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    
    
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site