Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Lunars with Young's formula: always off by several minutes
    From: William Porter
    Date: 2018 Oct 30, 14:41 -0700

    I have taken several lunars lately and reduce with Young's formula. Thank you to George Huxtable for the excellent piece and reading list. I am currently using a spreadsheet. I am using haversine methods, with which I am well familar from sun sights, with a view to the future but I don't think that is relevant. I have a decent Chinese metal micrometer-screw sextant and can take a sight. I have checked my observations and calculations with star-star sights but CANNOT correctly reduce lunars. I get errors of up to 5' to 9' or more. In desperation I took a lunar on Polaris so I would KNOW what the true distance was (because I could check with a little "plane sailing" at the pole). That came out to about 1'. Still way too much, bot obviously less. So I am getting either the parallax or the RAs wrong or am working out the true Distance wrong. Would someone VERY patient be willing to take a couple of my sights and reduce them for me to help islate my problem?

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site