NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunars for dummies like me
From: Jan Kalivoda
Date: 2004 Sep 25, 15:28 +0200
From: Jan Kalivoda
Date: 2004 Sep 25, 15:28 +0200
Frank Reed wrote: Let's consider two cases: 1) You have no timepiece, not even an ordinary watch. In a case like this, you would shoot your lunar and your time sight simultaneously. That is, the altitude of the Sun is used to clear the lunar *and* to generate Local Apparent Time. This requires lunars where the Sun is well away from the meridian. And you're basically limited to using the Sun, but that was by far the prefered "other body" for lunars in any case. =================== Yes, but not the only option. During the twilight, you can e.g. take three altitudes of the Moon and Regulus and three distances between those two bodies without even marking the time. Average both sets of altitudes and the set of the distances. You then have the distance and altitudes for the same moment. Now from the cleared distance you have GAT and from the altitude of the Regulus (if not being too near to the meridian) you will find LST (using the DR latitude); change it to LAT and gain the longitude from LAT - GAT. You don't need any clock, you can limit yourself to the sandglass for ringing the bell and cooking eggs. I only repeat the procedure from Thompson's tables (1828). Jan Kalivoda