Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Lunars accuracy
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2007 Oct 26, 11:14 -0700

    To those list members who are interested in the practical accuracy
    of the Lunar Distance Method:
    I just posted comparison graphs of the error distribution
    in the two publications of 1889 (Bolte and White) as well
    as my own data.
    So we have hard data for the discussion of the accuracy
    of the Lunar method represented in a clear way, I believe.
    Some preliminary conclusions from these data are:
    a) the method is less accurate at sea BY A FACTOR OF 3.
    (Bolte is not the only source, he sites one other research on land
    and one at sea, and they also confirm this conclusion).
    b) even on land, even with averaging, you cannot achieve 0'2
    accuracy RELIABLY. It is true that MOST observations are within
    this limit, but the outlays of about 0'5 seem unavoidable,
    even in the averages of series.
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site