NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Lunars: Theory vs Practice
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Mar 23, 17:10 EST
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Mar 23, 17:10 EST
George H wrote:
"we have only been considering those times in the month when
the
declination is changing at its fastest, twice a month near when the
declination passes through zero. Twice in the month the declination stops
changing, and anywhere near those times Dunbar's method would be quite
useless."
declination is changing at its fastest, twice a month near when the
declination passes through zero. Twice in the month the declination stops
changing, and anywhere near those times Dunbar's method would be quite
useless."
Twice a month really does not render a method for finding
longitude useless, even if it were intended for use at sea (the above
was not). As I've pointed out on several occasions, the venerable "lunar
distance method", which most certainly was practical at sea, was typically used
ony for a few days around First Quarter and Last Quarter. Yes, a navigator had
the option of using stars for lunar distance observations to extend the
period for observation during the week around Full Moon, but it seems that
practicing navigators at sea usually didn't bother (italicize that word
"usually").
Lunar distance observations were one thing in theory... and another in
practice. In theory, lunar distance observations might have been done on a daily
basis using stars as frequently as the Sun with distances ranging from 20 to 125
degrees. In practice, lunar distance observations were mostly Sun-Moon
observations, done for a few days every two weeks, and mostly with
distances between 70 and 100 degrees. This rendered them less likely to be
affected by errors in the measured altitudes, the Moon's altitude especially
(that "Ninety Degree Miracle" business that I've mentioned), and also
considerably shortened the calculation in series methods since the quadratic
correction could be ignored (it's proportional to 1/tan(distance)). In
addition, this consistency in practice implied a consistency in the
clearing procedure. Sun-Moon lunars are always "Near Limb" sights. Sun-Moon
lunars at wide distances like this are almost always "Upper Limb" sights for the
Moon's altitude because of the positioning in the sky and Lower
Limb sights for the Sun out of habit (and so for every lunar, a navigator
could use -20 for the Moon and +12 for the Sun for the combined semidiameter/dip
correction of the altitudes). All of these little things streamlined the
practice of lunars and made them useful for the purpose to which they were best
suited: a fortnightly check on the longitude by dead reckoning (in the
period up until roughly 1835) or the longitude by chronometer (in the period
from roughly 1835 to 1855).
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars