NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunars
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Dec 9, 01:56 EST
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Dec 9, 01:56 EST
Bill you wrote: "Observation Error #1 -0.2' #2 -0.1' #3 -0.1' #4 -0.2' #1 and #2 with neutral-density shade over moon and light green over Venus: #3 and #4 with neutral-density and light-green shade over moon and light green over Venus. I was pretty pleased, but then the separation was only in the upper 15d range, so relatively easy. I was somewhat surprised all were under." I don't think you should worry too much about this (that they were all "under"). These are excellent results, and the fact that they are all negative values probably means nothing. Considering the weather at the time of those sights and the low altitude of Venus, you might want to experiment with varying the temperature during the clearing process to see how much that will influence the cleared distance. The air has been very thick in the Midwest US recently! High barometric pressure and Siberian cold guarantees a significant increase in atmospheric density and therefore refraction. -FER 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars