NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunars
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Dec 9, 01:51 EST
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Dec 9, 01:51 EST
You wrote: "Site # Error in Lunar Error in Lon 2 0 min -0.8 min 3 -0.4 min -11.6 min 4 -1.3 min -37.5 min 5 -0.2 min -7.3 min 6 -0.1 min -2.0 min 7 0 min -0.3 min 8 -0.7 min -22.6 min From this I deduce a number of things. Firstly if my interpretation is correct I have a consistent tendency to not quite bring the bodies into tangency. This would be borne out by my sense that I had to try to bring things closer and that the bright "penumbra" for lack of a better word - around the moon caused me to prematurely assume tangency. Secondly I am horribly inconsistent. Does anyone have suggestions about judging tangency? Any other suggestions - other than practise - to improve matters." Apart from the 1.3' error, these are EXCELLENT results, and you should be very pleased with them. If the approximate standard deviation of your lunars is 0.2 arc minutes or so, you're doing very well. Don't worry so much about the error in longitude. That's intrinsic to the method of lunar distances. If you could get angular altitude measurements, as opposed to lunar distances, as accurate as this for ordinary LOP celestial navigation, the error in position (longitude, if the object is bearing east or west) would be the same as the error in observation, in other words less than 0.2 nautical miles, in most cases. So what about that 1.3' error? I find in my observations, that the errors seem to come from two sources. There is a seemingly irreducible scatter of observations with a small error and then there is a secondary source of error that's quite a bit larger and more common than I would expect from the distribution of the "small" error. Another way of putting this is to say that the error distribution has "fatter tails" than the expected normal distribution. That second source of error might be something as simple as a hand tremor that develops with fatigue. Varying your procedures --taking breaks, holding the sextant differently-- might remove those larger errors. But that's just a guess... Could be anything! -FER 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars