Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: A Lunar theory question
    From: Antoine Couëtte
    Date: 2010 Apr 7, 08:23 -0700

    Dear Jeremy,

    Here you are again !

    :-) + :-)) !!!

    You just requested :

    QUOTE

    Is this the reason that we choose bodies close to the ecliptic for lunars?

    UNQUOTE

    I think it safe to first indicate that the Historical Interest of Lunars has been to attempt determining TIME with the "best" achievable accuracy.

    To this effect the fastest moving body being the Moon, to achieve such "best accuracy" you certainly want to take the Moon Distance by reference to (second) bodies having the fastest varying distance from the Moon per unit of time, i.e. close to the Moon path in the sky. This is where the distance from any past/future point on this path will likely vary to the greatest extent per unit of time. Such path is simply ... close from the Ecliptic (up to +/- 5°).

    If Moon + other body are (almost) 180° apart while both close to the Ecliptic, they will likely have almost opposite declinations.

    Hint ! Do not take an object too close from the Moon (case of an Occultation for example). By the effect of Parallax, you might see both bodies "fast" closing or moving away while actually their Geocentric Centers Distance might remain almost constant !

    Another more "classical" counter-example : just figure out the expected accuracy from a Lunar using Polaris ... Such Moon-Polaris distance might not vary very fast (absolute maximum distance variation per unit of time would be more or less the Moon declination hourly variation). It then explains why all Lunar stars are close to the Ecliptic. Planets do also fully this specific condition.

    In the very best cases if you have the chance of getting a second body close from the Moon path, you would get a variation of their distance close from up to 1800" per hour. That is about the absolute maximum hourly distance variation which can be observed.

    Hope this first "go" can help you. And, of course ...

    ... I leave to Frank and/or to George to get into further details on this.

    Best Friedly Regards from


    Antoine M. "Kermit" Couëtte

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site