Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Lunar stuff (was: Calculating accurate apparent-angles between stars)
    From: William Allen
    Date: 2003 Jan 8, 12:35 -0800

    George,
    
    I for one will be very appreciative of any work you can provide and I will
    wait as long as it takes.  I can only imagine how time consuming this must
    be!
    
    And I agree that we hope Bruce will take to heart the serious interest that
    many of us having in not only using his book of tables but also
    understanding the theory behind the tables.
    
    As for the targetted lunar epoch, I would suggest that we aim for the heyday
    of lunars, which might be just before chronometers become widely available
    at reasonable prices.  Would this be a period around 1800 to 1850?  I'm not
    as expert on this as many of the other members, but this is my first
    thought.  Without the benefit of the Cotter book, I am wondering what year
    did Borda (and others) first publish his (their) methods?
    
    Thanks for the reminder about the various Cotter books.  I own the History
    of the Sextant, but you are right, there are other navigation titles written
    by this Cotter.  I am trying to get the History of Nautical Navigation from
    my library.  The prices mentioned by other helpful members seem a bit steep.
    
    Regards,
    Bill
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Navigation Mailing List
    [mailto:NAVIGATION-L{at}LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM]On Behalf Of George Huxtable
    Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:47 AM
    To: NAVIGATION-L{at}LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM
    Subject: Lunar stuff (was: Calculating accurate apparent-angles between
    stars)
    
    
    Bill Allen said. in a thread: Calculating accurate apparent-angles between
    stars
    
    >I have been silently following the lunar discussion with fascination for
    the
    >last year or so.  You might say I am on the lunar-tic fringe.
    
    It has surprised me how many listmembers with an interest in lunars have
    bobbed up to the surface over the last year. It's been most gratifying.
    
    >I agree with George and his assessment of our needs for some detail behind
    >Bruce's tables (which I own and have used, but like many, I wish I knew the
    >rationale for what I am doing).
    
    I hope, and think, that Bruce is hearing these messages.
    
    >Also, George, I really appreciate the write-ups you did explaining lunars.
    >Am I correct that there are only 4 parts or have I missed number 5?
    
    Thank you, Bill. You are quite correct, sorry to say. I would be deeply
    embarrassed about the situation, if I were the embarrassable kind. It's
    become a family joke, here.
    
    >I don't know if you
    >had given any thought to going back through these and making any additions
    >or corrections that might apply.
    
    Well, what's on the stocks just at the moment is a revision of part 4, in
    particular that section that deals with the possibility of calculating
    predicted altitudes of the Moon and other-body, instead of measuring their
    altitudes. This is a point that I got quite wrong in the original message,
    and have been steered in the right direction by helpful interventions from
    listmembers, for which I am most grateful. I'm going to be off-watch, away
    from this coming Saturday 11 Jan for about 6 weeks, and it's touch and go
    whether I can complete this revision and get it out to the list before
    then. I will if I can. The intention is to tie up the series in a final
    message (or maybe two) after my return in late Feb. Whether this
    good-intention prevails over other commitments and a certain natural
    indolence, remains to be seen...
    
    The aim then will be to tie together all the parts of a lunar observation,
    up to deducing the longitude. One problem is this: lunars play no part in
    present-day navigation, so anyone making lunar observations nowadays is, to
    some extent at least, delving into the past. But what period in the past?
    The historical aspect becomes important, because the details of nautical
    tables, and indeed the way navigators have thought about their
    position-finding, have changed very significantly over the years. To some
    extent at least these changes will need to be reflected in the final part
    (or parts) of my series about lunars, when it appears. The intention is
    that it WILL appear, and I appreciate the occasional nudges from
    listmembers such as Bill, encouraging me to finish the thing off.
    
    =========================
    
    Now for Cotter's book on "A history of Nautical Astronomy". Don't order the
    wrong book: he wrote several others on nautical technology, including a
    good one on "A history of the navigator's sextant". I am glad that my
    listing of errors to be found in Nautical Astronomy hasn't put off
    potential readers.
    
    I bought my copy about 3 years ago, which had to come from the US, at about
    $90, as I remember. I put it on the Abebooks waiting-list, where it
    languished for about 3 months before a copy turned up. Don't give up; it's
    worth waiting for, in spite of its defects.
    
    ========================
    
    By the way-
    
    We will be away in New Zealand, and this is the story behind it. I come
    from a big family, the oldest of seven siblings, and my youngest sister Syl
    is over 20 years younger than me. She has cohabited with her New Zealand
    partner for 16 years, producing two now-teenage daughters. Now, for some
    reason, they have decided to get married. Not one to rush into things, our
    Syl. So a lot of Huxtables are travelling to Christchurch, and as the
    bridegroom is also one of a large family, it's going to be a big and
    enjoyable shindig.
    
    Or it will be, if President Bush doesn't manage to set the world on fire in
    the meantime.
    
    George Huxtable.
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site