Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.
    From: Geoffrey Kolbe
    Date: 2009 Aug 09, 16:46 +0100

    George [NavList 9432] wrote
    >Indeed, that would be the case, if we were measuring azimuths, but we're
    >simply timing the Moon as it passes a vertical line, so the correction is
    >constant in time, independent of altitude.
    Sorry George, am I missing something here? The point I was alluding
    to is that when you time the edge of the moon as it touches the
    vertical hairline, the centre of the moon is then not just a
    'semi-diameter' away, but a 'semi-diameter divided by the cosine of
    the altitude' away in azimuth. Since the tables for the moon's
    position are for the centre of the moon, that is the correction you
    must make to determine the LHA between the moon and the star at that
    moment in time. Is that not so?
    NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
    Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site