Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Lunar eclipse report
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2004 Oct 31, 22:34 +0100

    >Frank Reed wrote:
    >
    >> All you need is a careful observation of the sidereal time (which is
    >> the right ascension of the zenith). With a fixed installation, you
    >> could mount a sight tube. For a temporary setup, you could hang a
    >> couple of plumb lines and stand between them extending the lines. This
    >> should give local sidereal time within two minutes or better. Assuming
    >> roughly two minutes error in eclipse event timings and two minutes
    >> error in local time, the average expected error would be about three
    >> minutes --less than a degree error in longitude.
    
    Herbert Prinz has examined the question of error in local time. Here, I
    wish to question how realistic is Frank's assumption of "roughly two
    minutes error in eclipse event timings." I think this question has come up
    previously on Nav-l. How good an assumption is it that an observer can time
    some moment in an eclipse, and agree with another observer who is timing
    the same eclipse, to within two minutes? Also, how precisely will they
    agree with the mid-time as predicted in the almanac?
    
    The trouble is that none of the shadow-edges is really sharp, but somewhat
    fuzzy, due to the fact that the Sun isn't a point-source, but subtends half
    a degree. Assume that each observer has a timepiece, so that they can
    estimate the mid-point between the last flash of light at the edge of the
    Moon, and its reappearance on the other side.
    
    Has such a test between observers ever been reported? They can be at the
    same position, or at differing (known) longitudes: it doesn't matter much,
    as long as they are out of immediate contact with each other.
    
    The recent eclipse would have provided a good opportunity for Nav-l members
    to indulge in such an exercise: at least,those enjoying clear sky, which
    excluded me. Perhaps, it would be an interesting try-out at the next lunar
    eclipse.
    
    Of course, timing such an event was easier on land than it ever was at sea,
    before the days of deck-watches. Star time-sights didn't work when the
    horizon was dark. You couldn't set up a North-South transit line, as could
    be done on a beach with two sticks in the sand. And presumably water-clocks
    didn't work at sea. So timing an eclipse, though useful for longitude on
    land, wasn't very helpful out at sea.
    
    George.
    
    ================================================================
    contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by phone at
    01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
    Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ================================================================
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site