Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Lunar altitudes
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2003 Apr 17, 06:38 +0100

    Fred Hebard said, about the plot of land-based lunar distances, from the
    1850s, that I recently posted-
    
    > Also, since George had bragged about the
    >data being so good, I assume that his data point at 22h 39m 00s 29d 43'
    >50" was a typo, where the 43' should have been 45', and changed that
    >point accordingly.
    
    Fred deduced my error correctly. Sorry about the typo.
    
    =======================
    
    On a separate matter altogether, Jan Kalivoda asked a sensible question,
    under this thread on lunar altitudes, a few days ago, as follows-
    
    >The method of lunar altitudes for finding the GMT seems ideal to me for
    >the observation above an artificial horizon (ashore, of course). The
    >problems with dip, with the blurred sea horizon, with the short period of
    >twighlight would then disappear completely. With an artificial horizon one
    >can wait through the whole night, until the Moon with a star (not very
    >distant from the Moon, but their azimuths don't matter too much in this
    >case) come to the prime vertical. Many occasions can arise through the
    >month and one could expect better results than with lunar distances, isn't
    >it? . This could be very important in early days, when the knowledge of
    >the accurate longitude was an exception outside the Europe and USA (maybe
    >Caribbean) and the method of combining local time and longitude to obtain
    >the GMT was therefore unavailable in remote countries.
    >
    >Had you anybody heard anything about such usage? I didn't.
    >
    >Maybe somebody from the list, who is in possession of a sextant and an
    >artificial horizon, can try this method? It cannot be too difficult, I
    >guess (from the desktop).
    
    =======================
    
    Because I hadn't read Jan's question carefully enough, my response was
    completely irrelevant, referring to lunar-distance measurements rather than
    lunar-altitudes. So once again, sorry about that.
    
    I agree that the methods proposed by Chichester and others, using lunar
    altitudes rather than lunar distances, would have been more appropriate for
    on-land measurements using a reflecting liquid than they would for sea
    measurements using the horizon. But like Jan, I have seen no account of
    such a method in use on land.
    
    George Huxtable.
    
    
    
    ================================================================
    contact George Huxtable by email at george---.u-net.com, by phone at
    01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
    Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ================================================================
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site