NavList:

   

Reply

I see you and George still hashing some things out.
I think Frank's work can be mentioned in a paragraph on how "lunars
enthusiasts are still developing and testing refinements... Frank Reed's
method(citation of Nav-L discussion thread)(citation of Frank's lunars
website) is similar to ..... but differs in ...".  This avoids a
"presentation of original work", and keeps things within the realm of
verifiability.  After all, Frank has not yet published the method, and we
haven't seen published evidence that other practitioners have put the theory
to the test by presenting the data from a carefully-designed set of test
cases.  And we haven't seen an exhaustive literature search to find out if
the exact same thing hasn't been tried before.

Renee

-----Original Message-----
From: NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] On Behalf
Of Fred Hebard Fred-at-acf.org |Renee Mattie on NavList|
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 8:43 AM
To: .....................
Subject: [NavList 3081] Re: Lunar Distance in Wikipedia


On Aug 3, 2007, at 8:19 AM, 539dkp802@sneakemail.com wrote:

> George and Fred,
>
> * Has Frank published his recent work in a "citable" publication?

I don't know whether he's published outside of Navlist, but you could cite
the archives, if that's permitted.  Frank may jump in here on that..  I
inserted mention to Frank's work just as a guide, not as suggested text for
the article: the guide was a rough, suggested outline.







--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

   

Reply