Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Low altitude sun
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2016 May 19, 15:25 -0700

    Paul Jackson, you wrote:
    "would the near shore I used as the horizon be the reason I got a 0.0 intercept with this shot of a low altitude Sun."

    Here's how I would put it: you got an intercept of 0.0 because everything worked out nicely, partly because you did it right (I assume) and partly because of inevitable good luck in accidental cancellations. Your observation and the corrections happened to net out to exactly zero. This doesn't mean that the sight was perfect, nor does it mean that the corrections were perfect. But it's fun to see a "0.0" like that. At minimum, you can give yourself a gold star!

    When you get an apparently perfect result like this, it can be useful to do a little sanity check by varying some of the parameters a bit. Since you're using a dip short correction, you might check to see how much things would change if you used a height of eye that's one foot different from your original choice. Or you might try changing the distance to the shoreline you're using as a surrogate horizon by a quarter of a mile. Those differences are probably both within measuring error. Also you might want to look at the temperature/pressure correction table since the Sun was at a relatively low level in the sky. And of course you should remember that it all comes down to the accuracy of your index correction. Do you really believe that you know your index correction exactly to the nearest tenth of a minute of arc? If not, any error in the I.C. feeds directly into an equal error in the intercepts you get. It's not unreasonable to believe that your I.C. uncertainty is at least smaller than half a minute of arc. Normally, for celestial altitudes, I would count anything with an intercept less than half a mile as "negligible error" or "close enough to call it perfect".

    Frank Reed
    Conanicut Island USA

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site