
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Antoine Couëtte
Date: 2013 Apr 29, 06:23 -0700
Hello Paul and Marcel,
This Post in reply to your last 2 posts :
******
To you Paul,
RE : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Low-Alt-Refraction-Hirose-apr-2013-g23719
Thanks for specifying a Formula published in the "new" Explanatory Supplement (ES). It shows up as Formula (3.282-2) in the ES 1992 Edition.
Your remark prompted me into closer searching the "older" (Sep 1977) ES version for any actual information on Refraction at 0° apparent height. Apart from the Standard -34' value used for the SUN and MOON risings and settings, the only additional information in Section 2E is a reference to Chauvenet's "Manual of spherical and practical astronomy" (1960 reprint) and another reference to Smart's "Text-Book on Spherical Astronomy" (1944 reprint).
In Smarts's Sixth Edition (1977 / 1980 reprint) : again ... apart from the standard -34' refraction value, I fail to see any more specific mention to any Low Altitudes Refraction Values.
*******
RE : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Low-Alt-Refraction-Tschudin-apr-2013-g23724
Hello Marcel,
First of all, sorry for a few typos which I had mistakenly printed in my post RE : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Low-Alt-Refraction-USCG-Student-Example-for-Low-Altitude-Couëtte-apr-2013-g23718
Please find here-after a few comments where applicable.
QUOTE
Reference #3: The air pressure is given. I do not know what the water
pressure relates to.
UNQUOTE
REPLY : It means "Water Vapor pressure", i.e. Humidity 0%, or Air entirely dry.
*******
QUOTE
Reference #6: Could this have been a typo and the value been in
degrees, still requiring to add the sun diameter?
UNQUOTE
REPLY : This is a typo . Sorry again. This value actually reads - 34.0' which is most probably a simple copy/paste of the Standard -34' value used in the US/UK N.A.'s for SUN/MOON risings/settings.
*******
QUOTE
References #10 and #11: It looks like being the same formula. There
seems however to be a slight difference. Was #11 not copied correctly?
(I do not have the original reference.)
UNQUOTE
I do not hold a copy of such original formula either ...
*******
Best Regards to both of you
Kermit
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------