Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Longitude, the Bounty, and William Bligh
    From: Brad Morris
    Date: 2018 Dec 1, 17:29 -0500
    The new chronometer error (CE) is noted and supersedes the prior CE.  The new chronometer rate (CR) is noted and supersedes the prior CR.  The chronometer itself is never adjusted.  It is simply wound the same way, each time.

    I was very interested to hear that Bligh used lunars to correct his chronometers, melding both longitude solutions (lunars and chronometers) into one.


    On Sat, Dec 1, 2018, 5:17 PM Charles McElhill <NoReply_McElhill@fer3.com wrote:


    thanks for the response. I guess what I was attempting to ask in a round about fashion is, when a ship came to a remote port that had  a table reference for latitude and longitude, was it the practice to go ashore with instruments and chronometers to verify the accuracy of the instruments and chronometer attest location. Also, did they just note the chronometer difference or did they change it. I’m guessing they just logged the observed difference and pressed on.

    thanks again

    View and reply to this message

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site