Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Longhand Sight Reduction
    From: Hanno Ix
    Date: 2014 Nov 5, 20:28 -0800



    there might be an opportunity for another RIC!

    Doniol can be re-written such that only one table is needed - the haversine table. There is one condition, though, that requires adopting "s2s" in stead of Hc: s2s is my abbreviation for "Star to Ship" or "Ship to Star" meaning the spherical distance between the ship's location and the substellar point. We know that sin(Hc) = cos(s2s). Now, I can show to you that Doniol assumes the following form which uses only a single trig function if one adopts this s2s convention:

    hav(s2s) = hav(L-d) - [ hav(L-d) + hav(L+d) - 1 ]* hav(LHA).

    I don't need to stress the great advantages of the haversine - they are all well known. These advantages plus the reduction of the number of tables to one, the haversine table, will justify the proposed change of convention from Hc to s2s I think. s2s has the additional nicety that "smaller" means "closer" - a welcome fact for teaching and memorizing. You know, I always found it peculiar that one explains CelNav by drawing circles on the globe but ends up not using their radius in actual work. The additional complexity of teaching “higher” is “closer” is a cumbersome but unnecessary detour and just a matter of tradition.

    Now, here is an example / comparison: L =10; d =20; LHA = 40.

    a. Doniol: 

    n = cos(L-d) = cos(10-20) = cos(20-10) = cos(10) = 0.9848;

    m = cos(L+d) = cos(30) =                                       0.8660;

    a = hav(LHA) = hav(40) =                                       0.1170;

    So, sin(Hc)    = n - (n+m)* a = 0.9848 - (0.9848 +0.8660) * 0.1170;

          sin(Hc) = 0.7683;              

                 Hc = asin(0.7683) =                                             50deg 12';

    and       s2s =                                                                   39deg 48';


    b. Above formula:

    hav(L-d) = hav(10-20) = hav(20-10) = hav(10)  =                  0.0076;

    hav(L+d) = hav (30)    =                                                       0.0670;

    hav(LHA) = hav(40) =                                                           0.1170;

    So hav(S2S) = 0.0076 - [ 0.0076 + 0.0670 - 1]* 0.1170;  

                       = 0.0076 - [ - 0.9254] *0.1170 =                       0.1159;

    and         s2s = ahav(0.1159) =                                           39deg 48';

    As you can see both agree. One sign rule here is the universal arithmetic rule of

    subtracting negative numbers which amounts to inverting both minus-signs -

    a case arising occasionally. And yes, there are the facts that hav is always positive

    and that hav(a-b) is always equal to hav(b-a).  Not hard to remember, is it?


    So, Greg, what do you think?




    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site