Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Logic of shades
    From: Brad Morris
    Date: 2018 Oct 26, 13:19 -0400
    Hello Alex

    Welcome aboard.

    The purpose of the multiple shades is rather pedestrian, at least in my view.  They are applied, singularly and in combination, until eye relief is obtained.  You can approach it the other way, of course.  Apply too much shade, removing shades until the observation can be made.

    You also commented that you have a replica sextant.  Please consider this merely an ornamental device.  Without calibration, we cannot identify these errors (1) scale marking (2) centering and (3a) If a drum, the regularity of teeth on arc and drom OR (3b) if a vernier, vernier markings.  

    NavList has discussed the topic of sextant calibration quite extensively.  All of the professional calibration facilities are long closed.  Gross sextant errors may be discovered, but I urge you to reconsider an arduous and error prone self calibration, unless you have access to extensive metrology equipment.  

    The Davis Mark 15 will provide very good results, under the assumption that you verify index error both before and after your round of observations, as these devices are highly affected by temperature changes.

    The ordinary slip-stick slide rule may perform some of the spherical trig.  Whst you may wish to consider is a cylindrical slide rule to get sufficient digits.  The Fuller will certainly turn the trick.  Moreover, the Bygrave is a special purpose cylindrical rule, manufactured explicitly for celestial navigation.  The "Flat Bygrave" is an excellent, cost effective substitute for a pricey antique 

    Brad

     



    On Fri, Oct 26, 2018, 12:35 PM alexander duytschaever <NoReply_duytschaever@fer3.com> wrote:

    Hello,

    I'm a n00b user/amateur astronav that dived into astro navigation after stumbling over a Bris sextant and wondering if one could ever perform LOP calculatons using a slide rule (got a few of those) :-) (*) So I soon acquired a small shiny King Hughes 1917 replica and recently a Davis Mk 15, and I can happily live with their shortcomings (found an article on how to deal with those shortcomings, and I still have to calibrate these three).

    My question is: what is the logic behind the different shades? I understand that one needs more shades for the index mirror (4 vs 3 for the horizon), but why were those colours (blue, blue, orange, grey) chosen? I suspect that the light grey colour can be used for moderate lighting or to increase contrast, and it also reminds of lunar light conditions; but the two blue glasses look similar (I guess a main function is to block out UV), but are there intended ways to combine those glasses?

    thx

    -alex-

    (*) for now, my answer is that a SR can serve for interpolations; it doesn't have enough digits to provide sufficient accuracy. or maybe with A LOT of sightings, who knows...

    View and reply to this message

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site