Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Location without DR
    From: Sean C
    Date: 2018 Feb 18, 18:56 -0800

    Paul Hirose wrote:

    "I believe latitudes from the program are equally probable in the intervals [0, 10] and [80, 90]. If that's true, the density of the random points increases from the equator to the pole. That may be undesirable for generating sight reduction practice problems, or data for a Monte Carlo experiment."

    I didn't quite understand why the density should increase toward the poles, so I decided to try and visualize the problem. I graphed 1,000 "random" points in excel. (See first attached image.) They seemed pretty evenly distributed to me. That is ... until I realized that I was essentially looking at an equirectangular projection. When wrapped onto a globe, the higher latitude points would be condensed due to the decreased spacing in longitude. When the same points are mapped in Google Earth (see second attached image), the problem becomes quite apparent. Compare the number of points near the North Pole with those in the Atlantic Ocean.

    Is that right?

    -Sean C.



    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site