Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Linear regression and other tools
    From: Tony Oz
    Date: 2018 Oct 13, 15:34 -0700


    Please consider a fictitious adventure. A navigator (apparently capable to see the stars in the daylight) obtains the folowing HCs on 2018-10-13:

    • 12:00UT, 60°00'N;30°00'E: HCDeneb = 43°19'12"; HCCapella = 18°22'10"
    • 12:10UT, 60°02'N;30°02'E : HCDeneb = 44°32'18"; HCCapella = 17°59'26"
    • 12:20UT, 60°04'N;30°04'E : HCDeneb = 45°45'59"; HCCapella = 17°39'02"
    • 12:40UT, 60°08'N;30°08'E : HCDeneb = 48°14'50"; HCCapella = 17°05'17"
    • 12:50UT, 60°10'N;30°10'E : HCDeneb = 49°29'51"; HCCapella = 16°51'59"
    • 13:00UT, 60°12'N;30°12'E : HCDeneb = 50°45'07"; HCCapella = 16°41'05"

    When he takes the sights he does not know his position yet.

    Our navigator also posesses a TI-83+ calculator using which with the above data he finds the following approximating functions (QuadReg function):

    • for Deneb's HC: 0.13199529·x2 + 4.154611098·x -25.42931898
    • for Capella's HC: 0.709664195·x2 - 19.42687497·x + 149.3005809

    He then substitutes the 12:30 as x in both equations and gets:

    • Deneb's HCat 12:30 is 47°00'12"
    • Capella's HC at 12:30 is 17°20'59"

    Now he looks-up GHAAries for 12:30 (which is 209°31'20") and finds himself at 60°06'N;30°06'E using the two-simultaneous-altitudes SR. That fix is perfectly equal to his real position at that time.

    If he choose just to average the HCs he would get somewhat different values: 47°01'05" and 17°26'30". One is almost there while the other is quite the way off.

    Considering the inerval (one hour) - the quadratic regression did the great job to recover good approximation functions. Bi-quad or cubic are only marginally better.

    This, I think, proves that interleaving sights of several bodies done even in rather longish time can give quite good fix.

    I hope it is not unrealistic to fit 5 interleaved sights of two bodies into ~15~20 minutes.

    Please comment.



    60°N 30°E


    GHAAries was calculated with the same TI-83+ using the formulas from Hennig Umland's excellent "Short Guide to Celestial Navigation" (chaper 15, long-term almanac).

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site