Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: � � � Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac data
    From: Ken Muldrew
    Date: 2004 Apr 22, 09:50 -0600

    On 21 Apr 2004 at 21:06, Bruce Stark wrote:
    
    > You may have found it, Ken.
    >
    > You wrote: "But it's just way too close to
    > the moon; 15?, in fact. Exactly 15?. Now I can't quite figure out what
    > error would lead to the captains recording distances that were off by
    > 15?, but for some reason the fact that there are no minutes or seconds
    > in the error makes me think it's possible."
    >
    > The vernier on Lewis's sextant read to 15" of arc, so I'm almost
    > certain the numbers on the arc would have been at 15? intervals. Also,
    > the index mark of the vernier was almost certainly near the right edge
    > of the "window frame" of the index arm. The 30? or 45? engraving they
    > should have been reading the additional degrees, minutes and seconds
    > from would have been outside the "window frame." Inside the frame,
    > where the serious reading was done, 60? would have appeared.
    
    I think this explanation is far more likely than my earlier thought
    that a magnitude 4.5 star was being mistaken for Aldebaran. There's a
    nice picture of just such a vernier given in the Mystic Seaport
    facsimile of Norie's Epitome. Frank Reed posted the URL about a week
    or two ago, but here's a link to the page in question:
    
    http://www.mysticseaport.org/library/initiative/ImPage.cfm?PageNum=2&B
    ibId=13617&ChapterId=28
    
    (that all has to be on one line).
    
    > Perhaps, given the difficulty of reading a vernier sextant by
    > firelight, or candle lantern, they picked up on the 60?, and counted
    > from there.
    
    I can believe that. Especially given the common error of using the
    wrong minute when reading their watch.
    
    BTW, for anyone who would like to now try reducing their sights to a
    longitude, the position of Betelgeuse at that time is:
    
    RA: 5h 44m 34s
    Dec: 7? 21.5'
    
    Just subtract 15? from all the lunar distances in George's series A
    and C.
    
       \----------------------------+---------------------------------+
    o_,
     O_/ \    Ken Muldrew, PhD      | Voice: (403) 220-5976           |
    <\__/7
     <\__  \  Dept. of Cell Biology | Fax:   (403) 270-0617           |
      | /
      "\ L  | University of Calgary | kmuldrew{at}acs.ucalgary.ca        |
    / /
       <    +-----------------------+---------------------------------+ /
    /
                   Morning coffee recapitulate phylogeny               L/
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site