Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Position-Finding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
    Re: Latitude by Talcott-Horrebow Method
    From: Geoffrey Kolbe
    Date: 2018 Nov 3, 23:53 -0700

    William Porter wrote:

    "To resolve 0.1" you'd need a 40" telescope (versatile thing, the """...). 0.1' seems a bit more likely."

    Well, you don't actually need 0.1 arc second resolution to achieve 0.1 arc second precision in measurement. The so-called vernier accuity of the human eye, for example, is about ten times better than it actual resolving power. A good example is reading a vernier caliper. At a range of three feet it is possible to determine the setting of a vernier caliper to 0.001", so the 'vernier accuity' is about 0.1 arc minutes where the resolving power of the human eye is around 1.0 arc minutes.

    It was possible to obtain 0.1 arc second precision on star sightings using the Danjon 'prismatic astrolabe', which was a step up from the class one theodolites I mentioned in an earlier post, even though their objective lens was more like 4 inches than 40 inches in diameter.

    Geoffrey Kolbe

    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site