Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Latitude by Lunar Distance
    From: Wolfgang K�berer
    Date: 2006 Nov 10, 01:31 -0800

    Dear all,
    while looking for more information on George's problem of when the drum
    sextant was introduced, I stumbled over an article outlining the
    procedure that Frank invented. It is:
    J�ger, M.
    Eine astronomische Ortsbestimmung ohne Kimm oder Libelle durch
    Ermittlung der H�henparallaxe des Mondes.
    in: Annalen der Hydrographie und Maritimen Meteorologie, Jg. 40 (1912),
    541 - 544.
    So the idea is not exactly original or new (94 years) and has been
    published in a peer-reviewed journal before, I am sorry to say.
    Alexandre E Eremenko schrieb:
    > This method is essentially based on the Moon parallax.
    > (Imagine that the Earth is very small. Then the
    > method will not work: all lunar distances are
    > the same, independently of your place on a small Earth).
    > To estimate the accuracy, notice that the ratio
    > of the distance to the Moon to the Earth radius is
    > 60 (very roughly). So the loss of precision due to the
    > method is by the factor of 60 under the most
    > favorable conditions.
    > These most favorable conditions are:
    > a) The Moon is near zenith, and
    > b) The two directions Moon-star are perpendicular.
    > So under these conditions, the method is less accurate
    > than the usual Lunar distances by a factor of 2.
    > If the Moon's altitude is 30,
    > multiply by enother factor of 2.
    > Now it is hard for me to believe that one can
    > measure distances with 0.1 or even 0.2 accuracy
    > permanently and reliably:-)
    > Some results posted by Frank seem to show that he can,
    > but it is still unclear whether he posts his best
    > results of average results:-)
    > I still have no definite opinion on this matter,
    > but my analysis of observations of Cook's expedition
    > seems to indicate much lower accuracy than 0.2'
    > And this was done from the ground,
    > by professional astronomers, possibly with the best
    > sextants ever made (?)
    > The Lunar method was advertized as having approx 1/4 of
    > a degree accuracy. This I believe.
    > Then the lunar-with-chronometer-but-no-horizon
    > method has probably 1/2 degree accuracy or so.
    > Alex.
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site