Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Latitude by Lunar Distance
    From: Fred Hebard
    Date: 2006 Oct 5, 23:15 -0400

    On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Frank Reed wrote:
    > "Now it is hard for me to believe that one can
    > measure distances with 0.1 or even 0.2 accuracy
    > permanently and reliably"
    > Sure you can! :-)
    > I have seen amateurs get 0.1 minute accuracy in lunars on the very
    > first try. It's about the sextant more than anything else. Myself, I
    > find a typical error of 0.2 minutes of arc, and if I shoot four and
    > average them, that yields 0.1 minutes of arc accuracy, again and
    > again.
    > Of course, every once in a while my eyes will water or my hands will
    > shake, and then it's as much as ten times worse.
    I'd like to believe you, but show us the data.  Alex has very fine
    data and a good sextant.  I've done OK, but not 0.1'.  Jan Kalivoda
    reported a few years ago on some data collected from a German steam
    ship around 1875.  The standard error was around 0.25', as I recall.
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site