Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Latitude by Lunar Distance
    From: Frank Reed CT
    Date: 2006 Nov 12, 00:21 EST
    Wolfgang, you wrote:
    "I never thought that re-inventing the wheel in celestial navigation was one of the goals of this group."
    Wolfgang, there are many goals for this group. I would say each member sees it in a slightly different way. But certainly "discussing interesting concepts in celestial navigation" is one of the goals of the group whether someone thought of it a hundred years ago or not. If you personally do not find the concept that you can 'get a positional fix from measuring lunar distances at known GMT without measuring any altitudes' interesting, well, that's a personal matter of taste, right? It is definitely a completely novel concept for anyone I've discussed it with including quite a number of people with very deep knowledge of celestial navigation. The fact that someone has thought of and written about something similar, though apparently a little off the mark, almost a hundred years ago is hardly surprising. What is surprising, amazing, astounding (!), is that you chanced upon such an article less than sixty days after I first mentioned it on the list. It's an entertaining coincidence.
    And you wrote:
    "But if - as you (no capitals) say - the criterion is that a concept is novel "to this group", well, the concept of finding one's position by astronomical observations certainly is a new concept for a group of 2nd graders; your grade of novelty is obviously dependent on the group of reference you choose."
    You dodged the question there , I think: was this concept new to you yourself? [capital letters seem to bother you --I apologize for that-- so I use the phrase "you yourself" for emphasis instead of "YOU" which I used previously] Did you, Wolfgang, know previous to my posts on the subject that you could get a positional fix, in longitude and latitude, by doing two accurate lunar distance observations? Did you know that it was possible to get a celestial fix without measuring altitudes? Have you seen this idea outlined anywhere before your recent accidental discovery in an old journal?? Has anyone else, for that matter?
    And you wrote:
    "What I want to say by that is this: in a group like NavList, where in my opinion a couple of discussions were way above the level of professional discussion in the heyday of celestial navigation (maybe owing to advanced tools of computation) , I would not expect that someone tosses in an idea as "new" without at least a small reservation that it might not be so new after all - which you now admit ("probably ten times, too"). "
    I did not claim it as "new". I think that's the problem here. You're perhaps a little annoyed at an offense that you only imagined that I committed. And please, don't start in on some semantic debate about how some words in some post might be taken to imply something if you spin them just the right way... I did not claim that this method was completely new to the world of celestial navigation.  I do still think that it is new (in the ordinary sense of the word --that they've never heard of it before) to the vast majority, let's say more than 99.9%, of the people alive today who are still proficient in celestial navigation or interested in celestial navigation in some other way (admittedly, a rapidly dwindling group).
    And you wrote:
    "Finally about my proficiency at taking and working out lunars that you made a subject of:"
    I've never "made a subject of" your proficiency.
    You concluded:
    "Which is to say: I am interested in the history of navigation for the cultural and scientific aspects of this subject. "
    Which, as you should know by now, is also my primary interest. Nonetheless, I also enjoy messing around with sextants, and I enjoy talking with people about sextants. I do think that one gets a much better understanding of the historical process by experimenting with the instruments of the trade.
    42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.

    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site