Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Lat/Long by Noon Sun
    From: Gary LaPook
    Date: 2009 Apr 27, 15:15 -0700

    Well I was impressed by the level of accuracy they achieved since it
    is much better than the 5 nm level of accuracy that has been discussed
    lately using sun sights around the time of noon.
    On Apr 27, 10:49�am, "George Huxtable"  wrote:
    > Gary Lapook wrote, in response to a posting by Henry Halboth-
    > You might be surprised by the level of accuracy in determining the longitude
    > from equal altitude 
    > (most of the "meat" is in the first of these links)
    > =====================
    > Comment from George-
    > This was an interesting 1916 paper which, in part, describes the preliminary
    > determination by sextant of the location of an observation station near
    > Baker, Oregon, which later became accurately known by precise astronomy.
    > It was made using equal altitudes of the Sun, presumably (though we are not
    > given such details) using an artificial horizon.
    > I don't think anyone should be surprised by the accuracy achieved. Indeed,
    > it was worse than they expected, being out by about 1 second of time (15
    > arc-seconds) in longitude, and nearly half a minute in latitude. This,
    > despite many averagings over several days, with none of the uncertainties
    > that arise when looking at a real horizon from the deck of a vessel.
    > Although it's been posted under the threadname "Lat/Long by Noon Sun", it
    > really had nothing to do with a noon Sun. The author tells us that his equal
    > altitudes were taken in the forenoon and the afternoon, without stating
    > exactly what time. But I suspect that they were made several hours apart, so
    > that the two Sun azimuths differed by somewhere near to the optimum angle of
    > 90 degrees.
    > They ended up suspecting that errors in the latitude could be due to
    > inaccuracies in their Brandis sextant, though that shouldn't affect the
    > equal-altitude longitudes.
    > I'm unsure about the lessons that Gary expected us to draw from that paper
    > (he didn't say) but it tells us nothing about longitude-around-noon (except
    > that it's avoided when precision is called for), and had no relevance to the
    > points Henry was making.
    > George.
    > contact George Huxtable, at �geo...@hux.me.uk
    > or at+44 1865 820222(from UK, 01865 820222)
    > or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site