Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Lat and Long by moon transit.
    From: Antoine Couëtte
    Date: 2011 Jan 29, 00:19 -0800

    RE :
    [NavList] Re: Lat and Long by moon transit.
    From: hhew36---com
    Date: 28 Jan 2011 20:27

    IT DID IT AGAIN : THIRD and LAST attempt since some text by the end of my post got suppressed on first two trials. This time, I have slightly modified the arrangement of the end of my text, and did not include the Annex which was transmitted OK on the first 2 trials. Will it go thru entirely this time ???



    Dear Hewitt,

    You wrote : "Looking at Kermit's results, I'd say he used the 6-30-2009 date."

    I will reply as follow :
    YES ! I used the 6-30-2009 (UT) date, with LT-UT = +9 , which was subsequently confirmed as correct by Jeremy.

    And for the time of the Moon Transit (UT=09h51m39.7s), I am getting the following data for the Moon :

    GHA = 229°56'3 with RA hourly change = +0°.5064 and

    DEC = S-12°38'7 with DEC hourly change = -12'.86

    The actual Moon declination on 6-30-2009 was (much) further to the South than what Jeremy first indicated : QUOTE The declination is about 7 degrees south UNQUOTE, which tells us that Jeremy's clue would actually have been more appropriate for 6-29-2009 as you say, but it was nevertheless quite "valid" for 6-30-2009 in the sense that the Moon was - for both dates - South of the 6-30-2009 Observer's Position.

    Hewitt, since in your subsequent post (RE : http://www.fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=115508) you indicated : QUOTE Thanks, Jeremy,, that clears it up nicely, -Hewitt UNQUOTE, which results are you getting for this Moon LAN ?

    I would guess that all of us - yourself, Peter, Andres, Kermit, and others - should derive (almost) the same end result (see my enclosed listing of entries and results : NOT INCLUDED IN THIS THIRD SENDING TRIAL), even with a plain parabolic fit to Jeremy's data which certainly should be fully appropriate here given both the "moderate" (55 degree) Culmination height and the rather "tight" (+/- 12 minutes of time) time-span around Culmination Time in this specific example.

    Best Regards


    Antoine M. "Kermit" Couëtte

    LAST NOTE TO THE ATTENTION OF FRANK E. REED : Now and then, I have noticed that some of my posts get "shortened/abridged" by your NavList Computer system. Any clue or reason for that, Frank ?

    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site