Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Landmark sights
    From: Paul Hirose
    Date: 2019 Aug 9, 21:15 -0700

    On 2019-08-09 8:31, Peter Monta wrote:
    > For example, how stable were the ground marks at transit telescopes?  As I
    > understand it, they put a target, collimator, and light source some
    > distance from the telescope to the south, to serve as an azimuth
    > reference.  If it habitually moved around multiple seconds, I would think
    > that would render it useless, and they would have gone with something
    > internal instead, such as a rotary encoder on the telescope's vertical axis
    > (microscope-reading scales).  Did they maintain statistics on
    > reference-mark performance at places like Greenwich, Pulkovo, or USNO?  Of
    > course they dealt with only a few marks directly to the south, not spread
    > out over the entire horizon, but at least it's a data point.
    
    Bear in mind that when an astronomical transit instrument observed its
    collimators, the distance was extremely short (by surveying standards)
    and presumably pains were taken to minimize temperature gradients around
    the building. This 1920s description of the Greenwich instrument
    mentions collimators north and south of the transit. Furthermore, when
    the latter was set vertical, openings in the tube give a clear line of
    sight so one collimator could observe the other.
    
    I don't see how the high stability attained in such a controlled
    environment can be relevant to geodetic triangulation, where the sights
    were many kilometers long over varying terrain.
    
    Determination of the collimation error:
    
    
    http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1926GOAMM..86A...2D&db_key=AST&page_ind=13&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_GIF&classic=YES
    
    At sextant accuracy I'm not worried about horizontal refraction. Anyway,
    it wouldn't be detectable since you don't have the internal checks of
    triangulation, where the angles must sum to 180 plus the "spherical excess".
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site