NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: On LOPs
From: Steven Tripp
Date: 2002 Apr 15, 12:07 +0900
From: Steven Tripp
Date: 2002 Apr 15, 12:07 +0900
On 4/13/02 9:18 PM, "Peter Fogg"wrote: > George Huxtable seems to have declared open season on navigational sacred > cows. > First it was the noon sight, now it seems to be the turn of the idea of > finding a > positive fix position within the confines of three intersecting LOPs. > > 'Well, the meaningfulness of a "cocked hat", whether from land bearings or > astro sights, is frequently misunderstood. It's a surprising fact that no > matter how good the navigator, only one time in four will his cocked hat > embrace his actual position, which is three times more likely to lie > outside it. This is a universal truth, relying in no more than this > proposition: that each position line, being the best estimate that can be > made, is just as likely to lie to the left of the true position as to the > right. So it's a big fallacy to imagine that the true position must be > within the cocked hat. Instead of a probability of 100%, it will be just > 25%.' This is sort of correct. There is a statistical method for calculating the confidence ellipse that surrounds the Most Probable Position. The size of the ellipse depends in part on the angles that the three LOPs cross at. I have a program which calculates the ellipse. I attach an example of a 95% confidence ellipse. If the mail server allows attachments...if not, I'll place it on my www server. Steve Tripp