NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Just getting started
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2007 Jan 19, 12:12 -0800
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2007 Jan 19, 12:12 -0800
Gary LaPook wrote: Yes that is the case as far as practical accuracy is concerned. Theoretically, accuracy is improved with shorter intercepts because the LOP, which is treated as a great circle for practical navigation, is really a "small circle" which would cause increasingly large errors with very long intercepts. But in the real world, choosung an Alon within 1� of your location shouldn't result in any perceptable differenc. I know some purists might point to some extreme cases such as in polar navigation or very high altitude sights but the above is the generally true situation. --- Garywrote: > > I have begun with H.O. 229 and purchased vol 3. Up > till now I don't > find it very confusing and enjoy the challenge of > looking up the data. > Thanks especially for the links to the Naut Alm. and > the calculators. > My biggest issue so far has been determining exactly > what to use for A > Long. if the min are close it is a no brainer > however sometimes I feel > like I should choose differently. i worked one > problem using a LHA of > 69 and one with 68 (for example) and found that I > got the same basic > answer once I plotted, just one intercept towards > and one away. Would > that always be the case and therefore not as > critical a decision as I > have made it out to be?? > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---