NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Joshua Slocum, Victor Slocum, and lunars
From: Wolfgang K�berer
Date: 2009 Mar 3, 17:54 +0100
From: Wolfgang K�berer
Date: 2009 Mar 3, 17:54 +0100
Frank wrote: "There's also Crowninshield's yacht "Cleopatra's Barge" in 1817 which was visited by that famous lunarian expert Baron von Zach who was astounded to discover that the whole crew knew and worked lunars." Now there's a sweeping statement! And it's mighty exaggerated. Going back to what Frank himself has "written about all of this on NavList before" in the archive (a neat resource, by the way, Frank, say thankya) I found this: "'The greatest part of the seamen on board the Barge,' said Mr. Crowninshield, 'can use the sextant and make nautical calculations.'"[NavList 3333] Of course it is a nice story, but not history. So far I have not even been able to verify that von Zach actually wrote this. The story (that is: the version with the black cook who casually talked about the different methods of clearing the distance) is told in a few New England newspapers that say von Zach wrote about it in his "Monatliche Korrespondenz". Unfortunately the last volume of that publication appeared in 1813 whereas the event supposedly happened in 1817, the year when - as can be verified by several accounts - "Cleopatra's Barge" was in the Med. To use this story as a historical fact - telling us anything about nautical proficiency aboard American vessels at that time - one would have 1) to take at face value that von Zach clearly understood what was said to him - and we don't know anything about his command of the English language and 2) we'd have to take at face value that what he was told was true, because von Zach doesn't say that he actually saw the greatest part of the seamen use the sextant and make nautical calculations. Now the assumption that such a statement were true is quite inferior to the assumption that Mr. Crowninshield - a man who obviously did not count modesty among his weaknesses - tried to impress a European savant by boasting about the abilities of his crew. To sum it up: This is not PRIMARY SOURCE EVIDENCE (your emphasis, Frank). Treating it as such is naive. It is oral history at best and has to be weighed carefully instead of taking it at face value. Best regards Wolfgang --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---