Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Position-Finding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
    Re: Jargon, terminology , words' meanings, etc.
    From: Bill Lionheart
    Date: 2018 Dec 2, 20:25 +0000

    Frank
    
    I agree on average sight. Cocked hat is not very helpful - except for
    comic value I suppose.
    
    The Symmedian point makes some sense from its construction and the
    isogonal conjugate of a median ("symmetric median"). However the
    alternative name, especially popular in the French literature is the
    Lemoine point.  Now for the case of more than three lines in the plane
    it is still called the (generalized) Lemoine point.  For example see
    Thas's paper (Thas, C. (2003), ‘A generalization of the Lemoine
    point’, Forum Geometricorum 3, 161–167.)  It might also be called the
    Grebe point.
    
    The symmedian point makes sense for triangle and it also makes sense
    for n+1 equations in n dimensions (for example n=3, GPS with four
    sats) as the construction is the reflection of some kind of median.
    (papers by Sadek et al) Again it does not make sense for  more than
    n+1 equations.
    
    There is an alternative. The Encyclopedia of Quadrifigures calls it
    QL-P26 the "least squares point"
    https://chrisvantienhoven.nl/ql-items/ql-points/ql-p26
    
    The Encylopedia of Polyfigures, similarly lists the Least Squared
    Distances Point
    https://chrisvantienhoven.nl/nl-items/nl-obj/nl-pts/nl-n-p6
    
    One nice thing is that as there is a systematic list of triangle,
    quadrilateral and polyfigure points we should not have the situation
    in the 1800s when several people come up with the same point and don't
    know it has already been discovered.  Or at least there is no excuse!
    
    Details of some the things I mention are in the paper I submitted with
    Kimberling and Moses to the Journal of Navigation.  If anyone on the
    list is interested I can send a sneak preview but it is not on
    "general release" yet! (bill.lionheart{at}manchester.ac.uk)
    
    Best wishes
    
    
    Bill
    On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 at 18:20, Frank Reed  wrote:
    >
    > Bill Lionheart, you asked:
    > "On this subject of terminology can I check what you call the result of 
    averaging a series of sights of the same body? Is it still called a sight?"
    >
    > I suggest that we stick with plain language whenever possible, so I call 
    that "the average" or "an averaged altitude" or "an average of sights". It 
    doesn't need a new name.
    >
    > Speaking of altitudes, one of the most common cases of jargon confusion in 
    celestial navigation comes from the shorthand names used in sight reduction. 
    We have Hs for the "raw sextant altitude" and Ho for the "corrected sextant 
    altitude" and sometimes we even throw in Ha at an intermediate stage. These 
    "names" are about as obscure as they could be. You have to learn the names 
    eventually, at least Hs and Ho, to follow the literature, but training 
    beginners to "talk the jargon talk" should be a low priority. Save it for 
    later if possible. It's much more comprehensible if we write these out in a 
    bit of "longhand": write out "raw sextant altitude" and write out "corrected 
    sextant altitude" when possible.
    >
    > And then, of course, there's the symmedian point. This is a dreadful name, 
    but if we want to discuss the concept mathematically, that's it --that's the 
    standard name. There's no significant alternative. Myself, I have never once 
    used the phrase "symmedian point" in a class for beginners since it covers 
    only a limited case: the three-body fix with equally weighted sights and no 
    systematic error. This is not worth the time, and --even though it sounds 
    less technical-- I also never define the "cocked hat" since that's just a 
    weird name for something simple. We need the latter name to follow the 
    culture of navigation, the coded conversations of the subject (english 
    language navigation culture), but not to understand the subject and 
    principles of celestial navigation itself.
    >
    > (I originally wrote per se for "itself" but that's its own sort of jargon.. 
    going Latin is a bit passé... uh-oh... per se is passé??)
    >
    > Frank Reed
    >
    > View and reply to this message
    

    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site