NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Interpolation of Meridional Part Table
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2009 Mar 25, 21:44 -0700
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2009 Mar 25, 21:44 -0700
George, you wrote: "I suspect that the discrepancies between various calculations, that Andres refers to, result from imprecise definitions of the nautical mile. If it's assumed to be the length around theEarth's surface that subtends an angle of 1 minute between two local verticals, then when the Earth is taken as an ellipsoid, that length varies (a bit) with latitude. It's even different, at the same spot, when measured in different directions, because the Earth's curvature is different measured North-South to what it is measured East-West. For most purposes, we compromise on an average value of 1852 metres, which would be appropriate for a sphere. However, for geodetic purposes of precise survey, a value for the "geodetic mile" is taken that puts exactly 360 degrees, or 21600 miles, around the Earth's equatorial circumference, making a geodetic mile 1855.3248 metres." Yes. Quite so. The Bowditch version of the equation assumes that each degree of longitude at the equator contains exactly 60 nautical miles. I don't quite agree with Andres that the Bowditch formula is an "error in concept", though I see how he came to that conclusion. It's a scaling discrepancy only, and therefore a matter of units. Whether this is a literal error or not (even a tiny error) depends on what we do with the numbers next. If the numbers are then employed in a way that uses the same definition of a nautical mile, there is no problem. But it seems to me that this formula should have been updated to reflect the modern definition of a nautical mile. The difference is a small one regardless. According to Wikipedia (take it or leave it), the modern nautical mile was defined by by international agreement in 1929 and adopted by the U.S. on July 1, 1954. I quickly looked through some copies of Bowditch. This formula, with only one trivial change, has been in Bowditch since the major revision in 1881. From 1837 to 1881 Bowditch's navigation manual was largely unchanged with only small insertions (like a paragraph on Sumner's method tucked away on a previously nearly empty page --so as to save on making new plates for the whole volume) and some deletions of obsolescent information. Through that whole period, meridional parts were defined, as Brad gave previously from his 1849 edition, with an assumed spherical Earth. Starting in 1881, when the US Navy finally released its comprehensive overhaul of "Bowditch", the formula that Andres has quoted appears. This continues to the present day, and it is founded on the assumption that a nautical mile is exactly one minute of arc of longitude at the equator (no update with the heavily revised 1958 edition of Bowditch which would have been the first to reflect the new international nautical mile). The only very small change occurred a few years later when the exact value of the flattening was adjusted to reflect a slightly different spheroid model. -FER --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---