Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Instumental error?
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2005 Apr 20, 20:40 -0500

    > I have two observations:
    > 1.  It seems the SNO-T is a high-quality instrument.
    > If I recall, the specs
    > are plus/minus 10 seconds error along the arc (0.17').
    > Unless you got a
    > dud, any value higher than 0.2' is highly suspect.
    Yes, I afraid it is a dud.
    > 2.  Are you using the same star pairs when you get the 0.5', 0.6',
    > and 0.8'
    > values?
    I don't understand the question.
    On the same pair of stars the measurement are consistent.
    Stand dev is about 0.2'
    But you cannot measure substantially
    different distances with a same pair of stars.
    > Think we need to get together in a
    > more controlled setting with fresh eyes
    > and do some comparisons,
    Sure. I agree that more observations are necessary
    to develop a reliable table.
    So far it seems that only the very fact that such table
    is necessary is established.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site