Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Improving accuracy of fix by shooting 4 stars
    From: Greg Rudzinski
    Date: 2007 Nov 06, 14:45 -0800

    Another method for determining index error would be to compare an
    observation with it's back sight provided that the body is above 60
    degrees of elevation. Different parts of the arc are used so any arc
    corrections need to be applied.
    
    Greg Rudzinski
    
    On Nov 3, 10:47 pm, glap...{at}PACBELL.NET wrote:
    > A while ago Geoffrey Kolbe posted that one can determine index error
    > and get more accurate fixes by shooting 4 stars 90� apart. (See his
    > post below)
    >
    > The ION cd has an article that discusses this also, it is item 158.
    >
    > Here is a link to the ION table of contents:
    >
    > http://www.ion.org/publications/toc/celnavTOC.pdf
    >
    > gl
    >
    > Alex, the index error of a bubble sextant can be determined from an
    > unknown
    > position.
    >
    > By taking sightings on bodies in opposition, the separation of the
    > resultant position lines will, on average, be twice the index error.
    >
    > In my posting #2531, I advocated taking four sightings, a North-South
    > pair
    > and an East-West pair, on bodies at the Cardinal points. The North-
    > South
    > pair effectively give you your latitude and the East-West pair your
    > longitude. The position lines from the four sightings should form a
    > square
    > box if index error is the dominant error. If the box is not
    > substantially
    > square, there is a non-systematic error somewhere which is of the same
    > order or greater than the index error.
    >
    > Seehttp://www.pisces-press.com/desert/14thMarch.jpgfor an example of
    > what
    > I mean. In this example, the box is substantially square, giving us
    > confidence that the dominant error is indeed index error. The size of
    > the
    > box is about 10' on a side, from which we deduce that the uncorrected
    > index
    > error was 5'. The position lines are all 'away from' the body in
    > question,
    > so the sextant altitudes are 5' too small. I need to add 5' to my
    > altitudes
    > to correct the index error.
    >
    > A subsequent round of sights at a different location a few days later
    > show
    > the results when this 5' is factored in. Seehttp://www.pisces-press.com/desert/19thMarch.jpg
    >
    > Geoffrey Kolbe
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site