NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
IC tests and magnification
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2009 Jul 10, 00:31 -0700
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2009 Jul 10, 00:31 -0700
We've seen evidence recently that tests for index error using the sea horizon yield different ICs for different telescopes on the same sextant. That seems very strange. So is it in the specific test involving the sea horizon, or does it apply to other tests for index correction (like limb-to-limb tests which are generally considered more accurate anyway)? And can anyone think of a model that would explain the variability with different scope magnification for the standard test? There was a suggestion a "prismatic error" in the telescope could be the culprit. How could a prismatic error at any point after reflection from the horizon mirror change the angle of contact between two objects? If you put a think prism in front of the telescope objective, would two objects in contact in the field of view suddenly no longer be in contact? I don't think so, but I suppose we should try it out. Also, if that's the case, or it's something with a similar origin in the telescope optics, can we change it by rotating the telescope? Some sextant telescopes cannot be rotated, but others are screwed into a yoke, and presumably we could experiment by unscrewing the telescope by half a turn. Is the IC unchanged? -FER --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---