Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: How to round?
    From: Brad Morris
    Date: 2019 Jun 12, 21:02 -0400
    Tony

    You have essentially asked this question twice in a row.  First you were worried about the trigonometric identity series for your calculator, and now a question about rounding.  Both really ask "What about tiny values?"

    You wrote Today I decided to try no-scope sight again, alas, refraction conditions were severe, even with the 7x I was "toward 2.5 nm", without a scope - no worse than that.

    This refraction uncertainty is precisely why you need not worry about the tiny values.  At sea, you will not have the luxury of a known location with the ability to determine anomalous refraction.  So you always be under uncertainty.  In your case above, the rounding value you asked about (3 arc seconds) is FIFTY times smaller than your equivalent refraction at 2.5 nm.  Would 49x or 51x make any difference? No sir, it would not.  

    This is likely the reason you got the neutron answer.  There is no standard practice for your question, because it is completely irrelevant in outcome.

    Brad

    PS. Schrodinger's Cat does not like to be shipped with neutrons!!











    On Wed, Jun 12, 2019, 7:48 PM Tony Oz <NoReply_TonyOz@fer3.com> wrote:

    Brad, no, noodles make people overweight, I don't hang them. (Neutrons are even more dangerous - you'll get arrested in the first airport you visit - for smuggling of fissionable materials)

    I asked because in CN most of the values are tabulated to the tenth of arcminute, I thought I must handle the calculations properly - hence my question.

    By the way, since I got me a 7x (Keplerian) scope all (95%) my intercepts have decreased to ±0.2 nm. It's a big difference with where I started: 5~7 nm as a beginner with no scope, slowly getting to within 2~3 nm, then with a 3x (Galilean) scope I got to ±0.7 nm, and now this. Today I decided to try no-scope sight again, alas, refraction conditions were severe, even with the 7x I was "toward 2.5 nm", without a scope - no worse than that. I think - I'm making some progress. :)

    Warm regards,
    Tony

    60°N 30°E

    View and reply to this message

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site