Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Hc formula difference why?
    From: David Pike
    Date: 2017 Nov 21, 08:43 -0800

    Herman you wrote:
    The formula for solving the calculated height, in the celestial triangle, is written in different order and ways.

    You see Hc=arcSin((Cos L • Cos d • Cos t) + (Sin L • Sin d))
                  Hc=arcSin((Cos L • Cos d • Cos t) +/- (Sin L • Sin d))
                  Hc=arcSin((Cos L • Cos d • Cos t) ~ (Sin L • Sin d))
                  Hc=arcSin((Sin L • Sin d)+(Cos L • Cos d • Cos t) )

    And people ad it with different rules. For instance I remember ~ says subtract the smallest value from the biggest??

    Why al these differences, is it a kind of interpretation?

    What is the "original" formula?

    Regards,
    HermanD


    Speaking as a chap who can barely remember the rules for plane triangles these days and who never could remember anything to do with spherical triangles for more than half an hour, this is my interpretation. 

    What is being attempted here is to find the third side of a spherical triangle from two sides and an included angle.  However, Hc, latitude, declination, and LHA are not necessarily the sides and angle in the triangle.  E.g. in this case the unknown side is co-alt (90-Hc), not Hc, and t the known angle might be LHA or 360-LHA depending upon where the body is in relation to the observer.  Moreover, the body might be in the same hemisphere as the observer or the opposite, and P in the PZX triangle might be the North or the South Pole, so it all gets a bit complicated. E.g. if P and Z are in one hemisphere and X is in the other, the declination side is 90+dec not co-dec. Finally, the known sides or the angle might be more that 90, so the trig functions will only be positive according to the All, Sin, Tan, Cos rule, and these latter two examples are where I would suggest the + or – comes in.   If you want an original formula, I think you probably have to go back to a spherical triangle with angles A, B, and C, and sides a, b, and c, and adapt that to co-alt, co-lat, co-dec, and LHA or 360-LHA as suits your particular case. 

    So from the Cosine rule:

    cosa=cosb.cosc + sinb.sinc.cosA

    or:

    cosco-alt=cosco-lat.cosco-dec+sinco-lat.sinco-dec.cost

    but: sinx=90-cosx and cosx=90-sinx

    so:

    sinalt=sinlat.sindec+coslat.cosdec.cost

    or:

    Hc = arcsin(coslat.cosdec.cost + sinlat.sindec)

    DaveP

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site