NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Robert Bernecky
Date: 2010 Jan 24, 16:09 -0800
Hi Christian,
You are right, Mills did drop a minus sign in equation (3).
Getting to step 4 is not hard (I'm thinking you are going to think, "Duh"). But it's just not easy to always be clear when writing about math.
Here's one way to see what he did:
cos(alt).d(alt)= cos(lat).cos(dec).sin(HA).d(HA) (3)
Divide both sides of the equation by d(HA).cos(dec):
cos(alt).d(alt)/(d(HA).cos(dec))= cos(lat).sin(HA)
so that we can replace d(alt)/(d(HA).cos(dec)) on the left-hand side
with sin(x) (from equation 2). This gives us
cos(alt).sin(x)= cos(lat).sin(HA)
or, solving for sin(x):
sin(x)= cos(lat).sin(HA)/cos(alt)
and, by equation 2,
sin(x)= d(alt)/(d(HA).cos(dec))
so we have two different expressions for sin(x), and that
is what Mills is indicating with (4).
Robert Bernecky
Mystic CT
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------