A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Robert VanderPol II
Date: 2016 Jul 19, 21:08 -0700
So It sounds like you get a moderate improvement in RMS accuracy and worst error by using Sadler very near K. Is that correct.
For T<75 & Dec<75 how do Ageton 0.5 and 0.2 tables stack up against the same tables with Sadler for 87<K<93?
Is the +/-3o when Sadler starts improving the relative accuracy of Ageton over not using it, or is that when is starts giving good results on an abolute scale?